Rename the “Interference” Visualisation to “Co-Channel”
Why do this?
1. Because it is not Interference.
2. It is confusing customers - I have recently had two customers call me to ask if I could perform spectrum analysis to investigate “interference” because their Hamina survey showed a large amount of it. Their assumption was: “Look, it’s all red, so we must have interference.”
2. This has to be one of the easiest suggestions to implement - Come on it is quick win!
Why use the name "Co-Channel"
1. Because it is Co-Channel
2. We don't need to have the CCI or CCC debate. This works for both terms.
3. It would make me happy
Comments: 2
Oldest
•
Newest
•
Most likes
•
Fewest likes
-
11 Mar
Falk BachmannSo for Planner, we only take our own APs in consideration? As we should not have ACI because we plan it, but in most environments in large cities we would have neighbors, if i want to include their "whatever" would we still take this name? For surveys i would say we need various names that get explained in the documentation and via a small pop up on mouseover.